Best Price Canon EF 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 USM Standard Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras
Buy Canon EF 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 USM Standard Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras today at the best price and it's limited time offer. Look at our special deals today on our store. Get more and spend less when you buy Canon EF 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 USM Standard Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras. Also read our Canon EF 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 USM Standard Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras reviews before you decide to buy Canon EF 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 USM Standard Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras. Anything you have to know about this item, The Best Canon EF 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 USM Standard Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras Reviews
Canon EF 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 USM Standard Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras Reviews
Many customers was gave reviews and ratings to Canon EF 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 USM Standard Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras. If you want to read those detail to make your decision on this product just CLICK HERE
Canon EF 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 USM Standard Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras Overview:
- EF mount; standard zoom lens
- Internal focusing; aspherical lens
- 28-200mm focal length
- f/3.5-5.6 maximum aperture
- Micro UltraSonic Motor (USM)
Canon EF 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 USM Standard Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras Reviews, On Sale Canon EF 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 USM Standard Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras, buy Canon EF 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 USM Standard Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras, Canon EF 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 USM Standard Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras best buy, Canon EF 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 USM Standard Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras Discount, Canon EF 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 USM Standard Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras For Sale
Bedroom Furniture Reviews Camping Gear Reviews Kelty Tents Review
Canon EF 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 USM Standard Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras Reviews
261 of 266 people found the following review helpful Life's full of tradeoffs . . . I, October 13, 2005 By This review is from: Canon EF 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 USM Standard Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras (Electronics) I received my 28-200 yesterday from Amazon. Having read the customer reviews, I immediately put my Rebel XT on a tripod and ran two series of comparison shots with the 28-200 and my Canon 28-135 IS. Three shots each at f-stops 5.6, 11, and 20, one set indoors at ISO 1600 and the other outdoors at ISO 200. Focal length 135 using the same scenes with each camera, highest jpeg setting. After shooting both series, I compared them fresh out of the camera, side by side. Results: the 28-200 was at least as sharp as the 28-135 in both foreground and background in most instances. It was visibly sharper at ISO 200 with f-stops 5.6 and 20, (the 28-135 took the honors at f-stop 10), and at 20, it was visibly sharper in both the foreground and the background. The 28-135 was one-stop faster shutterwise. Both lenses produced pictures which would sharpen nicely in Photoshop. There are the vagaries of autofocus and different shooting conditions to consider; different test scenes conceivably... Read more
82 of 83 people found the following review helpful Good Lens For Wide Range Of Uses, May 27, 2005 By This review is from: Canon EF 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 USM Standard Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras (Electronics) I am a railfan, and having a very large range of zoom is important. Shooting on the fly from a distant bridge shot to a closeup coming around the bend. Focuses quickly too. I have a Canon 10D and I HATE changing lenses because it gets dust inside the camera. This 28-200mm is very practical for my hobby, and gets used on Waterfall and other outdoor scenery too.
One note of interest, it is hard to get super-sharp background details with this lens, compared to any of the IS lenses or the L Series lenses, (a buddy and I shot the same closeup shot with an ore dock way in the background and the dock details looked a LOT sharper on his 28-135 IS lens). Same Camera, same settings. Closeup Focused object looked great on both, just when looking at the out-of-focus objects, the IS lenses seemed to do better.
This lens is worth the price in my opinion, and superb for amateurs and hobby-photographers like myself. But those looking for a touch more in distant... Read more
51 of 52 people found the following review helpful A good film lens, maybe not so good with digital., January 31, 2007 By This review is from: Canon EF 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 USM Standard Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras (Electronics) I got this lens for a wedding I shot. Since I only had one camera at the time, I was afraid of losing shots as I switched back and forth. Since I was in need, I paid full retail price. Couple of comments. You need to have an external flash and be able to do bounce lighting for this lens to be really useful inside. Its a slow lens as the aperature is small. This lens is what I would call an "average" lens. It does everything good but nothing great. The advantages of this lens is the great focal length capability. 28-200mm covers alot of ground. If you travel and you just want to keep memories for yourself and keep your film/digital camera at full auto or f/ 5.6 to 8, you will get great results. use a 580 or a 430 ex flash and that will help compensate for indoors. I think the focal lengths work better for full frame or film cameras over the small sensor digital cameras.
The thing about this lens is the greatest asset of the lens is also the greatest weakness. To be able to... Read more
› See all 25 customer reviews...
261 of 266 people found the following review helpful Life's full of tradeoffs . . . I, By This review is from: Canon EF 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 USM Standard Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras (Electronics) I received my 28-200 yesterday from Amazon. Having read the customer reviews, I immediately put my Rebel XT on a tripod and ran two series of comparison shots with the 28-200 and my Canon 28-135 IS. Three shots each at f-stops 5.6, 11, and 20, one set indoors at ISO 1600 and the other outdoors at ISO 200. Focal length 135 using the same scenes with each camera, highest jpeg setting. After shooting both series, I compared them fresh out of the camera, side by side. Results: the 28-200 was at least as sharp as the 28-135 in both foreground and background in most instances. It was visibly sharper at ISO 200 with f-stops 5.6 and 20, (the 28-135 took the honors at f-stop 10), and at 20, it was visibly sharper in both the foreground and the background. The 28-135 was one-stop faster shutterwise. Both lenses produced pictures which would sharpen nicely in Photoshop. There are the vagaries of autofocus and different shooting conditions to consider; different test scenes conceivably... Read more 82 of 83 people found the following review helpful Good Lens For Wide Range Of Uses, By This review is from: Canon EF 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 USM Standard Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras (Electronics) I am a railfan, and having a very large range of zoom is important. Shooting on the fly from a distant bridge shot to a closeup coming around the bend. Focuses quickly too. I have a Canon 10D and I HATE changing lenses because it gets dust inside the camera. This 28-200mm is very practical for my hobby, and gets used on Waterfall and other outdoor scenery too.One note of interest, it is hard to get super-sharp background details with this lens, compared to any of the IS lenses or the L Series lenses, (a buddy and I shot the same closeup shot with an ore dock way in the background and the dock details looked a LOT sharper on his 28-135 IS lens). Same Camera, same settings. Closeup Focused object looked great on both, just when looking at the out-of-focus objects, the IS lenses seemed to do better. This lens is worth the price in my opinion, and superb for amateurs and hobby-photographers like myself. But those looking for a touch more in distant... Read more 51 of 52 people found the following review helpful A good film lens, maybe not so good with digital., By This review is from: Canon EF 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 USM Standard Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras (Electronics) I got this lens for a wedding I shot. Since I only had one camera at the time, I was afraid of losing shots as I switched back and forth. Since I was in need, I paid full retail price. Couple of comments. You need to have an external flash and be able to do bounce lighting for this lens to be really useful inside. Its a slow lens as the aperature is small. This lens is what I would call an "average" lens. It does everything good but nothing great. The advantages of this lens is the great focal length capability. 28-200mm covers alot of ground. If you travel and you just want to keep memories for yourself and keep your film/digital camera at full auto or f/ 5.6 to 8, you will get great results. use a 580 or a 430 ex flash and that will help compensate for indoors. I think the focal lengths work better for full frame or film cameras over the small sensor digital cameras.The thing about this lens is the greatest asset of the lens is also the greatest weakness. To be able to... Read more |
› See all 25 customer reviews...
No comments:
Post a Comment