Best Price Canon EF 28mm f/2.8 Lens for Canon SLR Cameras
Buy Canon EF 28mm f/2.8 Lens for Canon SLR Cameras today at the best price and it's limited time offer. Look at our special deals today on our store. Get more and spend less when you buy Canon EF 28mm f/2.8 Lens for Canon SLR Cameras. Also read our Canon EF 28mm f/2.8 Lens for Canon SLR Cameras reviews before you decide to buy Canon EF 28mm f/2.8 Lens for Canon SLR Cameras. Anything you have to know about this item, The Best Canon EF 28mm f/2.8 Lens for Canon SLR Cameras Reviews
Buy Canon EF 28mm f/2.8 Lens for Canon SLR Cameras at Best Price
Canon EF 28mm f/2.8 Lens for Canon SLR Cameras Reviews
Many customers was gave reviews and ratings to Canon EF 28mm f/2.8 Lens for Canon SLR Cameras. If you want to read those detail to make your decision on this product just CLICK HERE
Canon EF 28mm f/2.8 Lens for Canon SLR Cameras Overview:
- 28mm and light weight
- Aperture of 2.8
- Wide Angle features
- It has a lens cap
Canon EF 28mm f/2.8 Lens for Canon SLR Cameras Reviews, On Sale Canon EF 28mm f/2.8 Lens for Canon SLR Cameras, buy Canon EF 28mm f/2.8 Lens for Canon SLR Cameras, Canon EF 28mm f/2.8 Lens for Canon SLR Cameras best buy, Canon EF 28mm f/2.8 Lens for Canon SLR Cameras Discount, Canon EF 28mm f/2.8 Lens for Canon SLR Cameras For Sale
Kelty Tents Review Samsung Galaxy Tablet Reviews Macro Lens Reviews
Canon EF 28mm f/2.8 Lens for Canon SLR Cameras Reviews
65 of 74 people found the following review helpful 
Before you buy this lens!, April 6, 2006 By This review is from: Canon EF 28mm f/2.8 Lens for Canon SLR Cameras (Electronics) Make sure you buy it with the knowledge that you won't be able to use it to the full extent a wide angle lens is used to. Otherwise you will be severely disappointed with this lens. But just how so?
I know a photographer that uses this lens for wedding photography with her 10D. For her the lens does the job wonderfully. The lens takes sharp pictures, is light enough to haul around in a wedding, and wide enough on a 1.6 form factor camera to provide sufficient field of view for such event. The field of view on a 1.6 form factor camera would be equivalent to 45mm on full format; almost normal view.
I on the other hand used my 28mm lens for nature photography, and let me tell you the results were not just disappointing but down right useless! Simply stated, you will not be able to use high contrast/saturation landscape and nature pictures that are procuded by this lens. The bright sun will cause sever chromatic aberration in your pictures. Hence, the fringes of... Read more
50 of 58 people found the following review helpful 
Ideal waterfall lens, April 30, 2005 By This review is from: Canon EF 28mm f/2.8 Lens for Canon SLR Cameras (Electronics) Waterfall lovers will appreciate a 28mm lens, and the Canon f/2.8 is no exception. A 24mm lens often puts you into the spray zone. A 35mm lens isn't as dramatic. I prefer fixed focal length lenses for waterfalls and similar landscapes to eliminate the ghosting that blemishes photos taken with zoom lenses: this lens has fewer groups/elements, consequently fewer internal reflections. I sometimes couple this lens with a 12mm Kenko extension tube to create dramatic closeups of flowers.
Don't feel the more expensive f/1.4 is a "better" lens. In my experience, the ultrawide aperture lenses are harder to optically correct and seldom noticeably better--but they are noticeably heavier and more expensive. While the wide aperture might help with shooting action, you should ask yourself if a significant fraction of your photos require this. Otherwise you're paying money for nothing.
In short, this inexpensive lens is a solid performer and a great value.
18 of 19 people found the following review helpful So-so. But worth considering., May 7, 2007 By This review is from: Canon EF 28mm f/2.8 Lens for Canon SLR Cameras (Electronics) I bought this lens for a couple of reasons. First of all, I picked it up REALLY cheap used (and you can get it quite cheap even new). Secondly, I really wanted a standard-view lens for my Rebel XT. But honestly, I can't say that I am extremely impressed with it. Simply put, the sharpness is just not there like it is with, say, the 20mm f/2.8, 35mm f/2, or 50mm f/1.4. In fact, sharpness ranges from equal to worse than the 28-105mm (depending on aperture). There also seems to be somewhat of a decentering effect, where the right side of the picture is ESPECIALLY soft. And chromatic aberrations are on the high side. Honestly, I don't now how Canon went wrong with this lens, as the 35mm f/2 is a VERY similar design and actually a GREAT lens. Oh, and like the 35mm f/2, build quality leaves something to be desired.
On the other hand, it IS better than the kit zoom. And even though it really can't beat the 28-105mm in terms of sharpness, it DOES beat that lens in terms of contrast... Read more
› See all 19 customer reviews...
| 65 of 74 people found the following review helpful Before you buy this lens!, By This review is from: Canon EF 28mm f/2.8 Lens for Canon SLR Cameras (Electronics) Make sure you buy it with the knowledge that you won't be able to use it to the full extent a wide angle lens is used to. Otherwise you will be severely disappointed with this lens. But just how so?I know a photographer that uses this lens for wedding photography with her 10D. For her the lens does the job wonderfully. The lens takes sharp pictures, is light enough to haul around in a wedding, and wide enough on a 1.6 form factor camera to provide sufficient field of view for such event. The field of view on a 1.6 form factor camera would be equivalent to 45mm on full format; almost normal view. I on the other hand used my 28mm lens for nature photography, and let me tell you the results were not just disappointing but down right useless! Simply stated, you will not be able to use high contrast/saturation landscape and nature pictures that are procuded by this lens. The bright sun will cause sever chromatic aberration in your pictures. Hence, the fringes of... Read more 50 of 58 people found the following review helpful Ideal waterfall lens, By This review is from: Canon EF 28mm f/2.8 Lens for Canon SLR Cameras (Electronics) Waterfall lovers will appreciate a 28mm lens, and the Canon f/2.8 is no exception. A 24mm lens often puts you into the spray zone. A 35mm lens isn't as dramatic. I prefer fixed focal length lenses for waterfalls and similar landscapes to eliminate the ghosting that blemishes photos taken with zoom lenses: this lens has fewer groups/elements, consequently fewer internal reflections. I sometimes couple this lens with a 12mm Kenko extension tube to create dramatic closeups of flowers.Don't feel the more expensive f/1.4 is a "better" lens. In my experience, the ultrawide aperture lenses are harder to optically correct and seldom noticeably better--but they are noticeably heavier and more expensive. While the wide aperture might help with shooting action, you should ask yourself if a significant fraction of your photos require this. Otherwise you're paying money for nothing. In short, this inexpensive lens is a solid performer and a great value. 18 of 19 people found the following review helpful So-so. But worth considering., By This review is from: Canon EF 28mm f/2.8 Lens for Canon SLR Cameras (Electronics) I bought this lens for a couple of reasons. First of all, I picked it up REALLY cheap used (and you can get it quite cheap even new). Secondly, I really wanted a standard-view lens for my Rebel XT. But honestly, I can't say that I am extremely impressed with it. Simply put, the sharpness is just not there like it is with, say, the 20mm f/2.8, 35mm f/2, or 50mm f/1.4. In fact, sharpness ranges from equal to worse than the 28-105mm (depending on aperture). There also seems to be somewhat of a decentering effect, where the right side of the picture is ESPECIALLY soft. And chromatic aberrations are on the high side. Honestly, I don't now how Canon went wrong with this lens, as the 35mm f/2 is a VERY similar design and actually a GREAT lens. Oh, and like the 35mm f/2, build quality leaves something to be desired.On the other hand, it IS better than the kit zoom. And even though it really can't beat the 28-105mm in terms of sharpness, it DOES beat that lens in terms of contrast... Read more |
› See all 19 customer reviews...
No comments:
Post a Comment